**Montana | Politics**
—
**WHY IT MATTERS**
Mail-in voting restrictions proposed at the federal level could significantly affect Montana, a state where absentee and mail-in ballots have long been a central part of the electoral process. The executive order, signed by President Donald Trump, directs federal agencies to compile a verified list of citizens eligible to vote by mail in federal elections — a move election law experts say raises serious constitutional and logistical questions.
—
**WHAT HAPPENED**
President Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to develop what the administration calls a “citizen list” — a verified database intended to determine which voters qualify to cast ballots by mail in federal elections.
The directive, reported by Montana Free Press, has drawn skepticism from elections experts who question whether the executive branch has the legal authority to impose such restrictions on mail-in voting, which has traditionally been governed at the state level.
Montana has operated a largely mail-based voting system for decades. The state allows all registered voters to request an absentee ballot without providing a reason, and a substantial portion of the electorate regularly votes by mail. Any federal restriction on that process could disrupt how Montana counties administer elections.
Critics argue the order represents an overreach of presidential authority into election administration — a domain the U.S. Constitution largely delegates to individual states. Supporters of the order contend that tightening mail-in voting eligibility is a necessary step to ensure ballot integrity in federal races.
—
**BY THE NUMBERS**
– **56 counties** in Montana administer their own elections and rely heavily on absentee and mail-in ballot systems.
– **Roughly 70%** of Montana voters have cast ballots by mail in recent general elections, according to state election data.
– **1 executive order** signed by President Trump directed multiple federal agencies to begin constructing the citizen eligibility list.
– **2026** is an active federal election year, meaning any implementation timeline would coincide with midterm congressional races.
– The U.S. Constitution’s **Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4)** gives Congress — not the executive branch — authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of federal elections, a provision at the center of the legal debate.
—
**ZOOM OUT**
The executive order is part of a broader push by the Trump administration to reshape federal election rules, including earlier orders requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration. Several of those prior directives have faced legal challenges in federal courts.
Nationally, mail-in voting expanded dramatically during the 2020 presidential election due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and many states have retained or expanded those systems since. States like Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Utah conduct elections almost entirely by mail, meaning a federal restriction on mail-in ballot eligibility could affect millions of voters across the country.
Legal scholars have noted that while Congress has some authority over federal election administration through legislation such as the National Voter Registration Act, executive orders unilaterally restricting voting methods face a high legal bar. Several election law organizations have already signaled they are reviewing the order for potential court challenges.
At the state level, Montana’s Republican-led Legislature has in recent sessions debated bills related to absentee voting and ballot drop boxes, though Montana has not moved to eliminate its no-excuse absentee system. A federal order conflicting with established state procedures could create administrative conflicts for county election officials.
—
**WHAT’S NEXT**
Federal agencies have been directed to begin work on the citizen eligibility list, though no implementation deadline has been publicly announced. Legal challenges are widely anticipated, and election law advocacy groups are expected to file suits in federal court if the order moves toward enforcement.
Montana election officials have not yet issued a formal public response to the executive order, but county clerks and recorders who oversee local election administration will likely be monitoring developments closely given how central mail-in voting is to the state’s election infrastructure.
Congress could also weigh in. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have historically been protective of state authority over election administration, and any legislation codifying or countering the executive order would require action in both the House and Senate.
The next major test will come as the 2026 midterm election cycle advances and federal agencies release more detail about how the citizen list would be compiled, maintained, and enforced.